Case studies that show where revenue leaks and what changes when the system is repaired.

These are not portfolio pieces. They are proof that Kamil Skicki can find the commercial leak between proof, qualification, follow-up, and close, then fix the bottleneck that matters most.

Built for founder-led expert firms, agencies, consultancies, software houses, and premium operators with proof but inconsistent conversion.

StoneCo6% -> 15%+
Wave Growthroughly $100k average deal value
Nature Queen$8k -> $120k/mo

See how the Bleed Audit works

See the StoneCo case

What These Cases Prove

Kamil does not lead with channel theatre. He diagnoses the leak and fixes the system around it.

Each case shows a different leak pattern, but the route is the same: name the leak, sharpen the proof, fix the handoff, and make the next step obvious.

Flagship proof

StoneCo

Sales conversion moved from 6% to 15%+ after the commercial path was repaired across offer, value framing, sales behavior, and follow-up.

Leak: offer and close friction
Signal: activity existed, but deals still leaked
Why it matters: the cleanest wedge proof for expert firms with demand

Read the StoneCo case

See how the Bleed Audit works

Supporting B2B proof

Wave Growth

Demand-generation and automation systems produced leads tied to enterprise opportunities in a motion built around roughly $100k average deal value.

Leak: qualification and pipeline quality
Signal: the funnel looked active, but opportunity quality was weak
Why it matters: weak qualification makes more demand more expensive

Read the Wave Growth case

Supporting breadth proof

Nature Queen

Brand, lifecycle, and community systems helped support growth from roughly $8k to $120k/mo.

Leak: system coherence and compounding
Signal: brand, lifecycle, and demand existed but did not reinforce each other
Why it matters: breadth proof without replacing the B2B wedge

Read the Nature Queen case

Leak Patterns

Most firms do not have one vague growth problem. They have one or two concentrated leaks.

Offer and close leak: leads exist, but conversion is unreliable. StoneCo is the strongest proof.
Qualification leak: the pipeline is active, but too much of it is low-value noise. Wave Growth is the strongest proof.
System-coherence leak: brand, lifecycle, community, and follow-up exist, but do not compound. Nature Queen is the strongest proof.

The Next Step

If you can see your business in one of those patterns, the next step is not more generic activity. It is a diagnostic.

The Bleed Audit is a paid diagnostic, not a free strategy call. It exists to show where revenue is leaking, what it is costing, and whether a repair sprint is justified.

See how the Bleed Audit works

Already convinced? Apply

Best Fit

Built for firms that already have proof and demand.

Founder-led agencies, consultancies, software houses, and premium expert services
Teams willing to pay for diagnosis before they pay for repair
Operators with visible friction in packaging, qualification, follow-up, or close

Anti-Fit

Not for cheap execution shopping or idea-stage curiosity.

No real demand yet
Weak proof and weak economics
Retainer-first intent before the leak is named

FAQ

Keep the path narrow.

Why not just book a call?

Because the point is not a conversation. The point is a leak map, a priority order, and a repair path.

How is this different from a consultant?

The work is diagnosis plus system repair, not slideware, generic channel management, or outsourced busyness.

Why not send cold traffic straight to apply?

Because cold visitors need context before qualification. The audit page should educate. The application should filter.

Final CTA

Proof is only useful if it changes what happens next.

If the cases feel familiar, the next step is to find the leak in your own system and decide whether it is worth repairing now.

See how the Bleed Audit works

Already convinced? Apply